Will Our Decisions be better than History

imageEvery now and then my brother responds to an email in a way that makes me realize that I should have paid more attention in History class. The most embarrassing time was when I asked him to help me reconcile the fact that our paternal grandmother emigrated from Syria in the late 1800’s but that immigration records said she departed from Beirut. He pointed out the tangled history that established what we now know as Lebanon and suddenly things made sense. Once last year, while he was answering a question I had about Constitutional Amendments and the way in which, and the speed at which government responds to things, he pointed out that:

 “we didn’t even have ‘standard time’ until after the transcontinental railroad in 1869.”

Suddenly, I see the wisdom of George Santayana “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it” in a whole new light.

I am thinking about history and whether we ever learn from it for several reasons. I think about my grandmother, who was sent from Syria with two (perhaps three) sisters in search of a better life. I get a little sad when I realize how little has changed in that part of the world. I get hopeful when the news reports on how rapidly things seem to change in some countries, but those changes often evolve into “more of the same.” I notice that the technology that has been credited with helping to bring about some of those changes is often being treated as a threat by authorities, even sometimes in our own country. “Learning from history”, seems to be taking on a whole new meaning, as history in the making is being presented to us at the speed of light.

Just as the railroads ushered in the concept of ‘standard time’, technology companies have ushered in a new ability for people to communicate, inform and organize. We are left to wonder about how fast governments can adapt, and to what degree governments will try to control these new technologies? As I read about the history of Standard Time, I see that it was adopted in England in 1855, about 30 years before it was adopted in imagethe US. Now I realize there wasn’t an Internet back then, but you would think that at least one politician had traveled to England and heard about the concept. Still, Standard Time was adopted in the United States by the railroads first and then by several states. Finally in 1918 the Federal government passed the Calder Act, establishing standard time. Of course, the Feds decided to mess with Standard Time and established Daylight Savings Time in that same act… sigh.

Still, time is a unique commodity. We all have it, we all have the same amount of it and short of fairly drastic measures, and no one can take your time away from you or give your time to someone else. The Internet, hmm, that’s another thing entirely.

Governments can, have done and still do mess with the distribution of valuable commodities. Our government is wrestling with regulations, without which some say the Internet will be destroyed while others claim “all is well” without government help. Actions/inactions in this area are not trivial and the ability of our government to “get it right” is not certain.

Historically, our government has encouraged economic activity, research and construction by giving away commodities. Several variations of land grants were used to encourage the railroads to lay the tracks that ultimately connected the east and west coasts. Many men ended up very wealthy and historians seem to have opinions on both sides of the issue even today. In turn, the railroads influenced and perhaps controlled the growth of some towns and the demise of others. Railroad routes were often chosen by access to water and / or the ability to easily cross over water. Ames, Iowa, the town where my brother lives, has a history tied to the Union Pacific railroad although I’d be foolish to try and describe that history. In reviewing selected history of railroads and their access to land and water, I noticed that they are trying to figure things out in Nevada and Texas still to this day.

How our government acts today with respect to Internet access, mineral rights, water rights, the generation and distribution of electricity and a vast array of other economic issues may impact people 100 years from now. How we act should be different from how our forefathers acted 100-150 years ago. We have an amazing ability to communicate, to organize and to educate one another. Others in the world do not enjoy these privileges. I am not advocating any particular course of action; I don’t know enough about any of these subjects to do that. On the other hand, I am going to try and understand the possible consequences of the actions companies and governments consider, and I urge you to do the same.

11 thoughts on “Will Our Decisions be better than History

Add yours

  1. Pictures – That’s a ‘unit train’ passing through Ames, Iowa. They built the railroad through that spot because of the water. Railroads ran on water. Today, Barilla pasta is located near the same place, for the same reason – water. Water is abundant and the quality is worth the trip.


  2. Great post and great questions. Train and water caught my eye, even though many other words did, such as what you wrote about your ancestors coming from far away – very moving. Train and water are two big topics in California and both trigger heated discussion because our state government and federal government are taking decisive steps that will impact residents. Same for the Internet. I still think that government should play a role when it comes to public transportation, water safety and distribution and communication. With balance and citizens’ input of course. The danger comes when private agendas blend with public interest.
    Thank you also for the info about the Barilla pasta. I had no idea.


    1. Thanks. I was just listening to a news report about desalination efforts in CA. In a very short news story there seemed to be so many sides to the issue that I just don’t know how people can quickly embrace one answer on anything. I think our government has made huge mistakes in planning (or not) funding (or not) and supporting (or not) railroads and public transportation. Legislators don’t want to look beyond the next election, people are too focused on single issues. I don’t have the answers, but it frustrates me when people who should think about these things don’t think. Especially the people who are making laws and establishing regulations.


      1. 100% in agreement for the train and public transportation. It should have been a priority thrirty years ago, it is now too late.
        My kids have friends who go to the university in San Diego. We spoke recently about the desalination to bring more water to parched SD and its sprawling suburbs. It’s the beginning but it could be an asnwer. Although we are happy this weekend since we are finally getting a few inches of rain since Friday. Hooray!


    1. That might be an acceptable approach if they put some though into who they were electing. I try to avoid third-rail issues like politics, but some of the things these people come up with just makes my head hurt.


Add your thoughts. Start or join the discussion. Sadly, multiple links require moderation.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: