Welcome to Thursday Doors! This is a weekly challenge for people who love doors and architecture to come together to admire and share their favorite door photos, drawings, or other images or stories from around the world. If you’d like to join us, simply create your own Thursday Doors post each (or any) week and then share a link to your post in the comments below, anytime between 12:01 am Thursday morning and Saturday noon (North American eastern time). If you like, you can add our badge to your post.

I’ve always been intrigued by this church. It’s less than half a mile south of the First Church, a.k.a. Center Church, which was established even earlier. In case you think the founding members of those early settlements were one big happy family, the establishment of South Church indicates otherwise. As in the previous two posts, I am including information from the National Registry of Historic Places (NRHP) nomination form.

Established by some of the founders and early settlers of Hartford after a division in the First Church, South Church continues a tradition of free Congregationalism which has endured from its beginning here under Thomas Hooker. After nearly thirteen years of doctrinal dispute during which many of the original withdrawers removed to Hadley, Mass., the church was finally given permission to organize by the General Court in October 1669. The Covenant to which the founders formally subscribed on February 22, 1670, is thought to be the original written by Hooker, and is still in use today.

The current building is the fourth structure to house this congregation. Again, from the NRHP nomination form,

The present meetinghouse of the Second Church of Christ in Hartford is the third oldest public building in the city and one of only four remaining erected before 1830. The third meetinghouse raised for the use of the church since 1670, it is located in almost the same spot as its predecessors on Main Street, south of the Park, or Little River. The present building stands on the houselot of the second minister, Thomas Buckingham (served 1694-1731) which was subsequently deeded to the church’s ecclesiastical society by his wife and son.

The Meetinghouse is a two-story rectangular brick building, 96 by 63 feet, in the Federal style, with steeple and trim of wood painted white, on a high base of red sandstone. With its columned portico and multi-stage steeple it suggests an adaptation of the classic church by James Gibbs, noted English architect. Tall arcaded windows on north and south, echoed by the round-headed doors and windows of the facade set in tall brick arches, are separated by pilasters, while the pedimented portico rests on four finely proportioned Composite (Ionic-Corinthian) columns.

In several other Thursday Doors posts where I’ve included church doors, I’ve received comments about the absence of a steeple, even thought a base appears and rises above the portico. In some cases, the steeples were destroyed by fire, weather or rot. In other cases, they were never built. When I noticed that the nomination form describes the steeple of South Church, in detail, I decided to include that description.

The steeple has five major stages in which the architectural elements of the portico are restated in classic sequence and in alternating simplicity and elegance of detail. The base, a square brick tower with clock dials, is ornamented on all sides with twin pairs of brick pilasters with wooden Doric capitals and architrave, surmounted by a balustrade of turned balusters and paneled pedestals. From this stage upward the spire is of wood. An octagonal belfry is next, with engaged Ionic columns at the angles separating arched louvered openings beneath Federal-style panels. The typical Ionic entablature leads to the third stage, a plain octagonal drum set off by circular molded casings quartered by key blocks. Three stepped setbacks support the fourth stage, which reflects the second on a reduced scale, but with the use of Corinthian columns. Its entablature is surmounted by an octagonal balustrade and the final stage, a plain octagon paneled above a heavy band course. From a simple cornice rises the ribbed metal ogee roof with gilded finial and weathervane. Despite its wealth of detail, the spire is carefully wrought into an expression of harmonious restraint.

The present building has not only served as a place of worship, but quite literally as a meeting house for the people of Hartford and as an auditorium for fine music from the day of its dedication, April 11, 1827. The Rev. Edwin P. Parker (served 1860-1912) regularly enlisted concert talent from Europe for meetinghouse performances. The ensuing musical vesper program continues to the present day. Hartford’s first public educational radio station, WSCH/FM, today known as WRCH, had its studios in the meetinghouse basement from 1963-1965 (maybe fodder for John Holton). The Fine Arts Foundation of Connecticut, Inc. was housed in the building from 1962-1967, conducting a variety of cultural programs.

The images submitted in support of the nomination included several interior photos. Since I don’t often get a chance to look inside, I’ve included more of the NRHP images than I normally do.

Note: Apparently WordPress has changed things. If you want to read the captions in the slideshow view of the gallery, you have to click on the little “i” in a circle. Sorry

If you are in a hurry and don’t wish to scroll through the comments, click to Jump to the comment form.

157 responses to “South Church – Hartford”

  1. This is a beautiful old building, Dan. The columns are lovely and I enjoyed your history about this church. I am glad it has been preserved.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Robbie. It’s so strange to have the two old churches standing so close, but it’s wonderful that they have both been preserved. Thomas Hooker was a very important man in Connecticut’s founding.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Fabulous building with wonderful architectural details and an interesting history.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad you liked this story, Sheree.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Wonderful church. I particularly like the door on Buckingham Street, with the row of small windows. My submission this week is still in Berwick. https://drprunesquallor279704606.wordpress.com/2021/07/15/thursday-doors-berwick3/

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I. Like that door, too, as it’s one I wasn’t able to photograph. Bucking ham street is part of a historic district I will explore after the break the end of this month.

      I liked the doors in your post, today. The intricate transom windows are amazing.

      Like

  4. […] Posted for Dan’s Thursday Doors […]

    Like

  5. I also liked the view from Buckingham Street. Beautiful buidling.
    Here is mine:

    Thursday Doors – Dean Castle

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I also like the door on Buckingham St.

      Your post really made me smile.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. […] Dan Antion’s exciting Thursday Doors and for Jude’s Life in Colour Photo Challenge 2021 – weekly […]

    Liked by 1 person

  7. theartblogger54 Avatar
    theartblogger54

    Very impressive building though the steeple seems a bit over the top & out of proportion (at least to my eyes)

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Maybe they wanted their steeple to be taller than the one at First Church. In any case, I like it, and I think it works well, although you might have to see it in context with the surrounding area.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. theartblogger54 Avatar
        theartblogger54

        You could be right and maybe we’re dealing with a ‘mine is bigger than yours’ situation here! 😎

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Two at opposite ends of the spectrum :-)

      Liked by 1 person

      1. theartblogger54 Avatar
        theartblogger54

        But both are legitimate forms of street art. That’s what I like about it you never know in which part of the spectrum the next piece of street art you see will fall into.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. They are both well done.

          Liked by 1 person

  8. That’s one fancy church spire, for all its ‘harmonious restraint’! Altogether I think it makes for a beautiful and surprisingly balanced building architecturally, and I imagine the internal acoustics are amazing :-)

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks Ruth. I have heard that the acoustics are very good. Music is still performed there. Personally, I’d love to hear the choir. The steeple is remarkable. I love that they’ve preserved it when others have removed theirs.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I remember once visiting the oldest church in London (All Hallows by the Tower) and miraculously catching a choir practicing a capella, standing together in a circle right in the middle of the church – it was truly the original kind of ‘surround sound’, a beautiful, echoing, haunting harmony of voices that vibrates your soul and makes the hairs on your arms stand on end! :-)

        Liked by 1 person

        1. That must have been wonderful.

          Liked by 1 person

  9. That steeple is outstanding!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks, I do like the steeple and I was happy to find the description.

      You have another great collection today.

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Anne Fraser @theplatinumline.blog Avatar
    Anne Fraser @theplatinumline.blog

    Doctrinal disputes do not suprise me at all. I remember the fuss when I lived in Wales and the Welsh Baptists were planning a joint service with the English Baptists. Here is my submission for this week.
    https://www.theplatinumline.blog/visiting-port-meirion-in-wales/

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I guess it shouldn’t surprise me, either. Of course, at the time of the dispute, both churches were much smaller. It’s interesting how they both grew over time.

      I wasn’t able to “Like: your post, but I very much enjoyed it.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. theartblogger54 Avatar
        theartblogger54

        The like button didn’t appear for me either.

        Liked by 1 person

  11. So beautiful, Dan. And the steeple is a work of art. Thank you for including its description, as I could trace on your pictures all the little details. It reminds me of a lighthouse. Maybe where it is painted white and the octagonal part of the bell tower appears nearly cylindrical, especially its third level.
    With thanks :)

    A tiny village home on my blog today: https://alluringcreations.co.za/wp/dreamy-blues-authentic-1885-tulcea-house-black-sea/

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Pat. I was so happy to find the detailed description of the steeple, I had to include it. At the time the church was built, there was a river, (The Park River, a.k.a. the Hog River) that ran through Hartford. It ran between First Church and Second Church. It was eventually buried.

      You have some wonderful images and interesting history today. Thanks!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Not often do we find a description that’s so easy to follow – but then we have these gorgeous images to help :)

        If I search your images, I’m almost sure that now there’s a road where the riverbed used to be.

        And, again, the black & white image of the N facade has a tree in it that I think it is long gone. Really, old / new images can reveal so much of a place’s history. Thank you for posting both.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. The river runs under Bushnell Park, and the Whitehead Highway, which joins Hartford to Interstate-91 north and south.

          Good eye for noticing the changes.

          Liked by 1 person

  12. I like these brick churches that I see in your posts. When there’s no king or plutocrat to finance a grand church people build cosy structures with the money that they can raise. I like them because they are so rooted in the communities that made them.

    Who’s bothered by closed gates?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Buildings here were primarily Brownstone, which was quarried in Portland, about 15 mi (24 km) south of Hartford but along the Connecticut River, so easily moved to the city, or bricks, which were being made in Windsor, just north of Hartford (and also along the river). There are many brick buildings from this era, and I love the detail they would work in around windows and along the roof line.

      Your post is wonderful to look at. So much color.

      Liked by 1 person

  13. […] gate which was shut could no longer be opened because of the growth around and over it. A good thing […]

    Like

  14. Murphy’s Law Avatar
    Murphy’s Law

    Now that’s a steeple you can’t miss! I like the triple hung windows and the columns. So glad you included the pictures of the inside. Awesome details. This building is a testimony to the superb craftsmanship from that period. How wonderful that it still stands proudly and elegantly today.
    Ginger

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad you like it, Ginger. I know the interior photos aren’t doors, but I so rarely get to see inside these buildings, I had to add them to the gallery. The windows were replaces in the 1930s after a fire, and they aren’t sure if they were replicated in the same form, but I like them regardless. I am very happy that it has been preserved.

      Like

  15. A beautiful old church. This goes to prove just how important it is to preserve such buildings!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It does, GP. I like the NRHP as much for the descriptions as I do for the fact that being listed gives these old buildings a better chance of surviving well into the future.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. That it does. It gives me hope!

        Liked by 1 person

  16. […] For Thursday Doors challenge hosted by Dan at No Facilities […]

    Like

  17. Lovely, but I’m unable to read most of the captions in full. The shorter I can read in the post, but the longer are cut and they don’t appear if I view the images in the gallery. One more to add to your WP complaint list, sorry to say.

    I continue my Santa Severa castle tour and we finally reach the museum door, and see the sea through some others.

    Thursday Doors 15/7/21: Santa Severa 3.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for mentioning the captions, Manja. Apparently, if you want to read the captions in the slideshow view, you have to click on the “i” in the circle at the bottom right. This is a new thing. I have no idea why.

      Thanks for the quiet walk in your post.

      Like

      1. I see now, Dan. This is certainly not something they needed to do. :p But yes, if I click ‘i’, I get a double dose of the same caption, one small, one big. :D

        Liked by 1 person

        1. The double dose is y fault. I though that maybe they weren’t showing captions, so I copied them to the description field.

          Liked by 1 person

  18. Wow, that’s a gorgeously grand building. I love the steeple, red brick, and white trim. The windows are just lovely. I would like to hear the choir sing in that chapel.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad you like it, Deborah. I do think it’s an amazing building, and it’s a fixture of the south end of Hartford. I may have to visit this church on a Sunday, once services are back in their full glory. I can only imagine that the choir sounds wonderful.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I think it would be a neat thing to do…listen to their choir.

        Liked by 1 person

  19. Good morning, it is a church day I see =^_^= beautiful, https://dymoonblog.com/2021/07/15/thursday-15th-2/

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Church and churches – they always make good Thursday Doors posts. Thanks for adding yours.

      Like

  20. Beautiful pictures/buildings. Nice that you have created those ones in black/white (excellent contrasts). Gr Stef
    I am playing too this week: http://www.ostendnomadography.com/2021/07/15/thursday-doors-setubal/

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks. I’m glad you like this. I included the B&W photos, but I can’t take credit for them. Those were from the NRHP nomination form.

      I enjoyed your post, as well.

      Liked by 1 person

  21. Dan, thanks for the history lesson and photos of this beautiful place. The 2nd 1st Church is not a surprise. Sad, but amazing that people can’t get along, even when fundamental likenesses and common bonds exist.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Suzanne. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised by the religious split, and I have to remind myself that, at the time, the churches would have been much smaller. Still, the two buildings are barely 1/4 mile apart. At least they’ve both been preserved.

      Like

  22. That steeple against that sky — wow. The story that goes with a building so often makes it kind of human, doesn’t it? And that most likely is the reason for preservation. Thank you for including the detailed description of the steeple; I am in awe of the vocabulary in it and am trying to learn from it. I depend heavily on words like “things” and that entire description was like a college course to me.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks! I, too, go to school on the descriptions in those nomination forms. I think they try to point out anything that is unique and worth preserving. Not just another brick church, of which there are hundreds in Connecticut. I love learning building terms.

      I am glad both churches have survived. I guess I’m not surprised at how there came to be two. It does seem quite human. I hope you have a good weekend.

      Liked by 1 person

  23. Hi Dan. That’s a handsome church. I love the complexity of the steeple and the contrast between the white and the brickwork. This time my doors are in West Sussex, England. https://oldbloggler.blogspot.com/2021/07/thursday-doors-west-sussex.html?m=1

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad you like this. White against brick is a common theme here in New England.

      You shared a great collection today – thanks!

      Like

  24. Wonderful church, storyline and especially the steeple – controversies always … though communities are trying to join and work together in this day and age – no doors per se, but must take a walk and leave my door behind!! Cheers Hilary

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Maybe someday we’ll figure out how to get along, Hilary. You would think that would begin in church, but it’s so often the beginnings of the differences we focus on. In any case, we have another beautiful building to admire.

      Liked by 1 person

  25. […] post will be added to Thursday doors a site where door lovers from around the world come together to share their latest finds. Feel free […]

    Like

  26. How can anyone just drive by a church without wanting to stop and photograph it? I really like that you show all different sides of the building, Dan. It takes me a bit, but I like sitting and thinking how I would walk around to view it. Interesting the five stages of steeple architecture. Who knew? I sure didn’t!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Ideally, I’d like to have a door in every photo, but sometimes, I have to give it up to some architectural details. I was glad to find the historic photo for the one side I couldn’t get to. Now you are well versed in the language of steeples. NExt time your with some know-it-all friends, drop the phrase “typical Ionic entablature” on them.

      Liked by 1 person

  27. I love my doors, but oh, you steeple! I have more doors from Maysville, Kentucky this week. https://marianallen.com/2021/07/frienddoors-maysville-i-lost-count/

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Isn’t that steeple grand? I love it, and finding the details included in the nomination form was a treat. Let’s hear it for “typical Ionic entablatures.”

      Liked by 1 person

  28. I have a “thing” for ornate columns. I used to sketch them in college. Beautiful.

    Like

    1. That’s cool. I’m glad I included the detail photo from the interior. Thanks for visiting!

      Like

  29. […] If you would like to read up on the history of the town this link has lots of interesting information with some lovely old photographs included. Thanks a mil for joining me on my walk around the shops of Ballycastle this week and for a lot more Thursday Doors carry on over to Dan’s blog. […]

    Like

  30. Thanks for another interesting historical account Dan. Nothing like some doctrinal differences to help establish a new congregation. The benefit for us is a great variety of lovely old churches to photograph.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Jean. I guess they never kissed and made up because I think both congregations are on church #4. Like you say, we get beautiful buildings to photograph.

      Like

  31. A wonderful tour of these historical churches, beautiful photographs, I enjoyed so much! thank you Dan.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Holly. I’m glad you enjoyed this.

      Liked by 1 person

  32. That’s a grand entrance! Reminds me of some of the many churches my mother took me to as a child. She liked to sample different ministers.
    I have some arched doors this week

    Serendipity (Thursday Doors and more)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. We had a good friend who liked to sample ministers. I think I’d like to visit this church on a Sunday once things are back in full gear. I can only imagine the choir.

      Thanks for joining us from one of my favorite places to find doors.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Manja was the one who got me looking at doors.

        I always loved church music, so I didn’t mind sampling different flavors. I never knew what my mother was looking for. Maybe she just liked the variety too.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. I’ve been in a lot of churches, mostly as the result of moving around. We’re very glad to have you in the Thursday Doors community.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. Thanks Dan, happy to be here.

            Liked by 1 person

  33. How extraordinary, Dan. Thank you for sharing and explaining the history. An amazing journey through time!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad you liked it, Gwen. I’ve always wondered why there were two churches so close together.

      Like

  34. The church building is beautiful, but also ironic, because it is in renaissance architectural style (renaiissance being the rebirth of the Greeks and Romans). Sigh, church splits, even doctrinal ones are not the best witness ….Here’s mine

    DAN A.’S THURS. DOORS July 15

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Different styles came in and out of fashion here in the 1800s and early 1900s. A lot of beautiful buildings were built during that time period. I love finding them.

      Thanks for joining us!

      Like

  35. I would not want to have to clean the windows in that building! Why I would think of that, I do not know. But it is an incredibly beautiful building. Intricate detail on the columns is magnificent.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Triple hung windows would be a challenge to clean. I love the column details. Not a door, but worth including.

      Liked by 1 person

  36. Churches. So much history, so many born due to dissension. Ahhh..enter the people. 😉The architecture always impresses me. And steeples are my favorite part. Like the church’s arms reaching to heaven.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That’s a nice way to think about steeples, Cheryl. People? Well, I guess people have always been people. What else would we expect? At least we got a nice church to look at.

      Like

      1. Beautiful churches. Indeed people are people. I managed to get my post together for today. Happy Thursday! https://dweezepenny.blogspot.com/2021/07/walk-with-methursdaydoors.html

        Liked by 1 person

  37. Here’s mine, a fine example of neo-Medieval Romanesque architecture: https://nofixedplans55.blogspot.com/2021/07/thursday-door-challenge_15.html

    Liked by 1 person

    1. A fine example indeed!

      Like

  38. […] My entry for Dan’s Thursday Doors […]

    Like

  39. All those panes arched windows are nice to see but I wouldn’t want to wash them😀

    Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Pam had that same reaction. I understand.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. But that is an awesome steeple construction. The Denver Mint is very cool inside but no pics allowed.

        Liked by 1 person

  40. What an amazing place, Dan. I love the octagon part, and all the circles and curves inside. Have a great rest of the week. Hugs on the wing.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Teagan. I love the details inside and ln the steeple. I hope you have a good slide into the weekend.

      Liked by 1 person

  41. The steeple’s detail is amazing and the inside is an example of what I might call ornate simplicity. I hope that makes sense. These are powerful doors in one sense, mine are powerful in a completely different way. :-)

    Thursday doors: powerful blue doors

    janet

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I think that’s a good description for the interior, Janet. I was surprised at how plain the walls are, but there is a certain elegance to the space.

      I enjoyed your doors very much.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. I can’t get the “likes” to load, can’t get a comment box to appear, and although I see the photo at the top, in the next area there’s just a blank that never fills. But I did like the door and carving attached to the wall.

      janet

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Thank you for the kind words!

        Liked by 1 person

    2. I do like the post, The simple doors seems fitting for St. Francis.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thank you so much! I thought so too!

        Liked by 1 person

  42. The steeple is a work of art

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks. I agree 🙂

      Like

  43. […] spotted this one, but foiled again. At least the home is gaze-worthy. Hope you can take a few to drop in over at Dan’s at No Facilities to gaze at more wonderful doors from around the world. He will direct your […]

    Like

  44. The forces of nature were with you in the #4 & #5 photos with such a lovely backdrop! A great piece of American history and architecture.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I did get lucky. That was the only day that week it didn’t rain. I’m glad you liked this.

      Liked by 1 person

  45. Those steeples really are something. They’re rare out here in the west.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I felt so lucky finding the details of the steeple construction.

      Like

  46. Fabulous building, Dan. Thanks for the great photos. 😁

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad you enjoyed this, John. I was lucky to find so many historic photos.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. They were pretty cool too.

        Liked by 1 person

  47. […] JoiningThursday Doorstoday -and combining with #Treesquare Day 15 […]

    Like

  48. Thanks for the tip about suing the “I” to read the captions – not sure why they made that change but assume there is always a reason

    and I did like the side view to see the windows – also nice history again – I enjoy learning

    and here is the Link to my post for this week

    Thursday Doors (#Treesquare July 15)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m not sure why these guys do anything. Why make it harder to read the captions, unless that feature is available for the galleries that didn’t show captions at all – I’ll have to check that out.

      Thanks for your doors and business lesson.

      Liked by 1 person

  49. In public school we learned about Ionic, Doric, and Corinthian types of columns. Why? So I could recognize the frilly dilly job in this post!
    Bummer about the caption reading – thanks for nothing, WordPress!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I remember learning about those different types of columns, Maggie – one of the times we said, “and when will I ever use this?” The answer, when you’re preparing a post for Thursday Doors :-)

      I’m hoping that the little i thing works in all galleries. The Block Editor tiled gallery never showed captions.

      Liked by 1 person

  50. That’s one heck of a Corinthian Column. Your door photos are cool, too.

    [No little “i” in a circle as I view the photos in this post. Maybe WP has reconsidered?]

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m not sure. Did you step into the slideshow?

      Like

      1. There is no slideshow here. Just your usual montage of images.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Oh. If you click on one, it should open a slide show. Are you using the Reader or a browser?

          Like

          1. Ok, I clicked on a photo and it turned into a slide show. Very snazzy. I never use WP Reader. I use Feedly to get here, so my answer is browser?

            Liked by 1 person

            1. Yay – now you have the little “i” – :)

              I asked about the Reader because several times this week, i clicked on a blog and the Reader opened on my iPad. It was after an upgrade and I think The Reader installed itself as the default browser.

              Like

            2. That’s trippy. I’ll watch for that…

              Liked by 1 person

  51. […] This is for Dan’s Thursday Doors Challenge […]

    Like

    1. Thanks Teresa. You brought us some very interesting artwork today.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thanks a lot Dan. My pleasure to share a bit of the artwork from Indigenous Australians. Happy that there are doors included there.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for participating, Robbie, Those are great “doors” :-)

      Liked by 1 person

      1. HI Dan, they used to be doors, one upon a time. I can imagine this building was very decadent and fantastic in its heyday.

        Liked by 1 person

  52. An excellent post that reminded me of all the church services I attended. (My father was a minister) Churches have the best acoustics. To hear music ascend, to listen to a pipe organ – I feel a sense of belonging.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I know that feeling.

      Liked by 1 person

  53. Very interesting indeed, and I really like the columns on the church!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad, Brenda. The church is a remarkable structure.

      Like

  54. Love me some traditional-looking churches. You give me brick and/or columns, and I’m a happy man. Some solid pics here, Dan!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad you enjoyed these, Paul. It’s hard to go wrong with the standards.

      Liked by 1 person

  55. pretty column. White doors and me don’t mix. My church has white doors leading into the sanctuary and one day I was pulling a chair through that door and caused a black stripe on it. lol

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The white doors work well with the brick, but I wouldn’t want to scuff them.

      Liked by 1 person

  56. Great read and building, Dan. I am certain it would have caught my eye, as well. You find the best.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Audery. This one is hard to miss. I’m so glad it’s been preserved

      Like

  57. The Corinthian column is breathtaking! Why does WP make changes and not tell bloggers??

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I can’t answer for WP. Now it seems you can see the first line of the caption, but if it’s long, as mine often are, you still have to press the ‘i’ which, in my opinion, is worse.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Not every new WP change is a good one!

        Liked by 1 person

Add your thoughts or join the discussion. One relevant link is OK, more require moderation.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending